Senate Should Follow House on NDAA Transparency
The best tool to prevent the government from wasting taxpayer dollars is exposure. The more the public knows about how elected officials are spending their money, the tougher it becomes for that money to be wasted. This is certainly the case when it comes to Pentagon spending, and the Taxpayers Protection Alliance (TPA) has been a stalwart advocate of transparency when it comes to how the Department of Defense (DoD) spends tax dollars. Just recently, TPA highlighted more than 180 earmarks that totaled more than $7 billion in the Omnibus-spending bill, just for DoD alone. Now, with the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) beginning it’s lengthy process from markup to final passage, it is time to turn attention towards a piece of legislation that is continually passed by Congress, yet continually put together behind closed doors in the Senate. The House Armed Services Committee will begin their full markup of the NDAA today, and we have already seen a summary of what HASC Chairman Buck McKeon (R-Calif.) is ready to put on the table. Looking to spend more than $600 billion this time around, there is certainly onus on Congress to proceed not only carefully, but openly. The full House NDAA markup will be available, as it has been since Congressman McKeon began chairing the HASC in 2011. Unfortunately, without full transparency in both the House and the Senate, taxpayers are left holding the bag on a more than half a trillion dollar piece of legislation that is essentially put together by a small group of elected officials seeking whatever means necessary in order to make sure it can reach final passage without it ever seeing any sunlight until after it’s already signed into law. Retiring Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.) laid down a familiar marker early this year when discussing the possibility of opening up the Senate process in marking up the NDAA. Roll Call detailed Senator Levin’s opposition where he cited classification concerns.