The Pentagon and Taxpayers Don’t Need MEADS
Before debunking the faulty arguments about why it’s supposedly necessary to continue funding the Medium Extended Air Defense System (MEADS), let’s take a look at the facts. And while doing so ask the question about why $400 million in taxpayer dollars should be used to fund this defunct program. Here are the facts. For starters, as John C. Hulsman pointed out in a recent opinion piece for the Christian Science Monitor, the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) said itself that this air-defense program “will never be operational.” Hulsman goes on to explain that “An original selling point for MEADS is its aspiration to have a 360-degree surveillance capability, as opposed to the Patriot or any previous missile-defense system. But if the Patriot system were equipped with three ‘multi-functional’ radar, it too, would have 360-degree coverage. In other words, MEADS in and of itself offers no new capability.” (Emphasis added).