California Consumers Benefit from Charter-Cox Merger

Johnny Kampis

July 27, 2026

This op-ed was originally published in the Orange County Register.

The Charter-Cox merger just cleared a key hurdle in California. An administrative law judge overseeing the merger proceeding between Charter and Cox in California has recommended the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) approve the deal with some conditions attached. Approval by the CPUC would be a step forward for California consumers.

Judge Jamie Ormond proposed 20 modifications to settlement agreements and five additional conditions. The stipulations include providing rental equipment for low-income customers, funding of existing community investment programs for 10 years at the current level, and an $8.5 million performance bond. 

CableFax reported that CPUC Commissioner Matthew Baker has suggested a different proposal to approve the deal with only minor adjustments to the settlements that Charter already negotiated with the state public advocates office (Cal Advocates) and the California Emerging Technology Fund. 

The smarter path is Baker’s. Charter already negotiated settlements with the Public Advocates Office and the California Emerging Technology Fund, the very organizations tasked with looking out for California consumers. Those agreements secured real commitments on pricing, service, and community investment. Layering on new mandates after the fact punishes companies for negotiating in good faith and signals to future investors that no deal with California regulators is ever final. The CPUC should approve the merger on the terms already agreed to and give consumers what they actually want, which is lower prices and better service, not another year of regulatory limbo.

Charter announced in May 2025 its bid to buy Cox in a $34.5 billion deal, a plan to increase its scale in broadband connectivity and the ability to take on tech giants in video and advertising spaces. The Federal Communications Commission and Department of Justice have already approved the merger, with California as the only stumbling block remaining. 

The merger must be completed by September 15, 2026, or Charter would have to restart some of the merger process and pay a $2.5 million filing fee. CPUC plans to vote on the merger at its August meeting.

Charter CFO Jessica Fischer said in recent comments that the company plans to roll out mobile and video integration in a short window after the merger closes. This integration will save consumers money and provide a better cable/mobile/broadband experience.

Fischer has made clear that bundling is job one. The company’s priority after closing is folding mobile and video into a single package with unified pricing, exactly the kind of consolidation that translates into lower bills for households currently paying for those services separately.

In previous comments to CPUC in support of the merger, the Taxpayers Protection Alliance (TPA) noted that the combining of Charter and Cox would do nothing to upset the competitive balance in the industry. The transaction would not create adverse horizontal effects on competition due to the limited overlap between the companies’ respective service territories.

Combining the two companies would increase economies of scale to yield a stronger consumer broadband competitor while also enhancing the competitiveness of the mobile wireless marketplace. The scale of the new company would boost operating efficiencies, helping drive down service costs and enable current Cox customers to benefit from Charter’s bundling options and superior customer service.

Charter intends to extend its own policy of an all domestic-based sales and customer service workforce to Cox, which currently outsources many of those jobs to other countries. Charter has also pledged that all those jobs will pay at least $20 per hour with comprehensive benefits.

A free-market system with little government intervention has proven to be the most effective way to grow the telecom industry in the United States. Competition in the marketplace spurs American businesses to make economic decisions that not only are in their best interests but also benefit consumers by improving the quality of services and lowering prices.

The combined forces of the two companies will provide benefits to Americans by more quickly closing the digital divide. Hopefully, CPUC approves the merger in August with minimal additional stipulations attached.

Johnny Kampis is director of telecom policy for the Taxpayers Protection Alliance.

Copyright © 2026 Taxpayers Protection Alliance

1101 14th Street NW, Suite 500 Washington, D.C. 20005