TPA Signs Coalition Letter Reminding Congress of Opposition to Online Gambling Ban
December 15, 2016
Congress is officially in recess, and after a very long election year filled with uncertainty it was a question as to what would happen during this year’s Lame Duck. For months Taxpayers Protection Alliance (TPA) and others warned that there could be trouble for taxpayers when Congress returned for the lame duck. One issue that worried TPA was the issue of a potential online gambling ban. There was talk that Congress may move to pass some type of online gambling and ban and last week Rep. Michael Fitzpatrick (R-Penn.) introduced a bill with language similar to the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA), HR 6453. Before the recess, TPA signed onto this coalition letter from Institute for Liberty opposing the inclusion of an online gambling ban in any lame duck spending bill.
Read the letter below:
December 5, 2016
Chairman John Culberson
Chairman, House Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, and Science
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Chairman Culberson:
We, the following free-market, limited-government, and freedom-oriented organizations are asking you to oppose language supporting any kind of ban or federal limitation on internet gaming that might be included in a “lame-duck” spending bill.
Our nation just completed a tumultuous election in which changing the way Washington does business was a central issue. This week, Speaker Ryan rejected calls to ease restrictions on earmarks in spending bills, citing the nation’s overwhelming desire to “drain the swamp” of DC. Business as usual will not be tolerated by the American people, yet we believe that an effort is underway to reward Republicans donors by passing the Restore America’s Wire Act (RAWA) and creating a de facto ban on Internet gambling.
Such language benefits only a narrow range of special interests and, more importantly, tramples on the Tenth Amendment protection of states’ right to set their own gambling and lottery laws. If passed, such language would affect the ability of millions of Americans to buy online lottery tickets, play daily fantasy sports and, most troubling, opens the door for federal interference in other state legislative matters. It may be online gambling today, but tomorrow it may be regulation of gun and ammunitions sales—a long time goal of gun control advocates.
Earlier attempts to pass federal gambling prohibitions were met with strong bipartisan opposition in Congress as well as from free market and limited government organizations like ours, the National Governor’s Association, the National Conference of State Legislators and the North American Association of State & Provincial Lotteries. As such, the bill failed to move past the committee hearing stage—this language has not even been “marked up.”
Furthermore, the consequence of RAWA legislation being buried in a spending bill sets a dangerous precedent for any party to use such bills in the future to circumvent the Constitution’s protections in a variety of areas, including the 2nd Amendment, which increases the possibility of further federal intervention in firearm and ammunition sales.
Were regular order to be ignored, organizations dedicated to preserving individual rights and the rule of law would hold members accountable for allowing this to happen. For those reasons and others, we ask for your firm and public opposition to the provision and ask that it be struck from any conference report.
Andrew Langer, President, Institute for Liberty
David Williams, President, Taxpayers Protection Alliance
Andrew F.Quinlan, President, Center for Freedom and Prosperity
Michelle Minton, Fellow, Competitive Enterprise Institute
Norm Singleton, Senior Vice President, Campaign for Liberty
Seton Motley, President, Less Government
George S. Scoville, III, Constitutional Scholar and Online Commentator