May 29, 2014
» Read More
The duplicative USDA Catfish Inspection program is just one of many examples
of waste CARFA would help to eliminate, saving taxpayers money
Today, the Taxpayers Protection Alliance and the National Taxpayers Union sent a joint letter to Capitol Hill expressing our support for establishing the Commission on the Accountability and Review of Federal Agencies (CARFA). The legislation, H.R. 4566, introduced by Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.), would be an important step in the right direction to fight the growing waste and inefficiency within our federal agencies. CARFA would conduct a six-year comprehensive review of federal agencies and programs in a bi-partisan construct and would give recommendations for elimination or realignment of duplicative, wasteful, or outdated functions.
Click 'read more' below to see the full letter
May 22, 2014
Yesterday, Taxpayers Protection Alliance put out a list of amendments that were being considered for H.R. 4435, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015. TPA provided members of Congress and all Americans with a guide on specific amendments and how members of Congress should vote. Just now, the House concluded their business regarding these offered amendments and will move forward with passage likely of the NDAA sometime this afternoon. Now that amendments have been debated and selected, TPA wanted to update readers on where there were victories for taxpayers, and where there were defeats. The debate on the NDAA will shift to the Senate and TPA will watch to see what the bill will look like after they complete their process, although unfortunately in that chamber of Congress, there is a lack of transparency in how they proceed on the NDAA, as TPA has noted recently. Regardless, it is time for Congress to take steps to ensure that the Department of Defense (DoD) is given the necessary tools to defend the nation while not using this legislation as yet another way to waste taxpayer dollars.
Click 'read more' below to see the updated list! » Read More
May 21, 2014
The House of Representatives is debating H.R. 4435, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, and the Taxpayers Protection Alliance (TPA) is providing members of Congress and all Americans with a guide on specific amendments and how members of Congress should vote. The guide is simple: the amendment number; the sponsor(s) of the amendment; a description of the amendment (text was taken directly from the House of Representatives website); and the correct way to vote. As an added feature, TPA has flagged some of the amendments with “Vote No! (Earmark Alert)” as potential earmarks. TPA takes a clear stand on these proposed amendments and makes clear whether they are beneficial to taxpayers or not. It is time for Congress to take steps to ensure that the Department of Defense (DoD) is given the necessary tools to defend the nation and not use this legislation yet another means to waste taxpayer money. TPA will continue to monitor these amendments as the bill makes its way through the House, Senate, and eventually conference committee.» Read More
click 'read more' below to see the list of amendments
May 13, 2014
» Read More
Last week, the Taxpayers Protection Alliance (TPA) highlighted how transparency should play a key a role in the markup of the upcoming National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), and how such efforts to make the markup process more open would help make legislation better for taxpayers. With those same concerns for transparency in mind, the Pentagon should take a serious look at reforming the ways in which they manage their own finances and seriously cut down on the taxpayer money that is predominantly wasted at the Department of Defense. Auditing the Pentagon is a reasonable request, and considering the agency hasn’t had an official audit in more than a decade, it would stand to reason that the time has come for those handing the accounting at DoD need to seriously consider ways in which the trillions of dollars, yes trillions, can be carefully examined so that all citizens can see where the money is going. The Pentagon, like any federal agency, only exists with the taxpayer money appropriated to it. The problem however, is that there has been no accurate accounting of how the money has been spent and that is why there is need for improvements and why those improvements must really take hold. Any entity that is not held to rudimentary standards when it comes to financial record keeping is essentially risking all the money it has been given. A lack of accountability leads to money being wasted, and since the derelict bookkeeping is an epidemic at DoD, quite a bit of taxpayer money is at risk.
May 5, 2014
» Read More
Washington, D.C. – The Taxpayers Protection Alliance (TPA) will be joining other leading conservative and free market organizations today at a joint briefing in B-339 Rayburn House Office Building at 12:30 pm to urge Congress to reject reauthorization of the Export-Import (Ex-Im) Bank. The Ex-Im Bank has been a waste of taxpayer money for far too long, and it runs directly counter to the principles of free-markets that our nation’s economy is built upon. The Ex-Im Bank engages in some of the worst forms of corporate welfare and cronyism on a regular basis and TPA is absolutely opposed to this bank continuing the kinds of destructive policies that kill jobs and harm taxpayers. A joint coalition letter signed by TPA stated that, “By paying foreign companies to buy American exports, the Export-Import Bank tilts the playing field away from mid-sized and small businesses in favor of large, politically connected corporations. The Airlines for America, for example, estimates that the bank’s recent loans to foreign airlines have killed as many as 7,500 jobs for domestic airlines in the United States. Eliminating the Export-Import Bank would level the playing field and allow U.S. companies to compete for business on their merits rather than the strength of their political ties to the bank.” TPA President David Williams added, “Year after year Ex-Im Bank doles out billions of dollars in below market financing to foreign companies at the expense of American jobs... By denying reauthorization of the Ex-Im Bank this year, Congress has a prime opportunity to help end some of the worst practices of cronyism we’ve seen in government.”
Click 'read more' below to see the full press release & letter
April 25, 2014
» Read More
United States Senator Richard Durbin (D-Ill.)
We all remember pork-barrel earmarks. Those pesky little projects that members of Congress snuck into spending bills to try and curry favor back home. Earmarks in the past have included $50 million for an indoor rain forest in Iowa; $500,00 for a teapot museum in Sparta, North Carolina; and $100,000 to the Tiger Woods Foundation. Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) categorized earamrks as “the gateway drug to spending addiction in Congress because they encourage members of Congress to vote for bloated bills they would otherwise oppose. Earmarks also waste money outright, contrary to the views of many members.” Responding to voter pressure, Congress instituted transparency rules for earmarks starting in 2008 and then in 2010, the House and Senate agreed to a two-year moratorium on earmarks. The moratorium was extended and most earmarks disappeared, except for the Defense spending bill. In fact, TPA uncovered 186 earmarks worth $7 billion (click here to see the full list) in the Defense Appropriations Bill that was part of H.R. 3547, the 2014 Consolidated Appropriations Act, aka the Omnibus appropriations bill. Now, Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) is calling for the full reinstatement of the earmark process in the halls of Congress. Senator Durbin wants to officially bring back the practice of inserting pet projects into bills in order to make it easier for members to vote in favor of legislation. Speaking on this last week, the Illinois Senator made the case for a return to an earmark-laden legislative process by using the example of the massive transportation bill
April 21, 2014
A couple weeks ago the House of Representatives passed the Baseline Reform Act. It then proceeded to consider the budget resolution for fiscal year 2015 and illustrate precisely why enactment of the Baseline Reform Act is necessary. Annual budget forecasts are guided by a series of assumptions set forth in the law. One of the assumptions is that spending on discretionary programs automatically will increase by the amount of inflation from year to year. This means that from the very beginning of the process, the federal budget assumes increased spending. It also changes the language that Members of Congress use when discussing the budget. Members take credit for spending “reductions” when budgets actually increase and opponents of lower spending claim programs are being cut or gutted even though their funding is actually increasing. The Baseline Reform Act ends the assumption of increased spending and forces Congress to determine spending amounts on each program based on merit and need, not inflation.When one listens to a budget debate, there is rarely clarity. The exact same document either “cuts non-defense discretionary spending by $791 billion . . . slashes education funding” and “decimates the safety net programs” or, it actually “grows the federal budget by 3.5% annually.” And, while it’s growing the budget by 3.5% annually, it is also cutting total funding by $5.1 trillion. Confused yet?» Read More
April 18, 2014
Every Tax Day is a painful reminder of how all levels of government waste taxpayer dollars. News coverage of an April 15th press event with new General Motors CEO Mary Barra (read here and watch here) is a harsh reminder of the $10 billion taxpayers lost in the federal government bailout of “Government Motors.” And now, the ongoing troubles with their safety recall of 1.6 millions vehicles and the lack of answers made available at a series of Congressional hearings only add insult to injury. There was much debate when the government bailed out GM back in 2009 and taxpayers were promised a return on the nearly $50 billion investment. However, in late December 2013 the U.S. Treasury Department announced it had sold back its remaining shares of GM stock - at a loss of $10 billion. As reported by USA Today, the now-departed CEO Dan Akerson said at the time that he did not think the automaker should repay the $10 billion. So $10 billion later, taxpayers also started the New Year to news that GM was recalling 1.6 million vehicles due to a safety issue that is connected to 13 deaths and another 31 injuries. We then learn that the company knew about the safety default and sat on it for nearly a decade.» Read More
April 16, 2014
Tax Day and the pain of filing and paying taxes has come and gone. When Congress returns back to work next week (yes, they’re on another break) they will have quite a bit of work to do to do to ensure that next year’s Tax Day isn’t as painful. Congress and the President have found numerous ways to spend tax dollars, it is now time to find ways to cut spending. The good news is that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has released its fourth consecutive report on duplicative spending and cost saving recommendations that could save taxpayers billions of dollars. The report details 64 new actions to address concerns in 26 areas. The 2014 report notes that over the past four years, 123 actions have been addressed, 172 actions have been partially addressed, and 75 actions have not been addressed.Taxpayers should be both disappointed and also encouraged by the findings in the report.
Click 'read more' below to see highlights of potential savings from the GAO report.» Read More
April 14, 2014
Find out what 'angry wives' have to do with taxpayer waste!
Taxpayers will reach the dreaded April 15th deadline to file their taxes tomorrow, so the Taxpayers Protection Alliance presents a new web video titled Top 10 Taxpayer Flops, Follies and Fiascos of 2014. This year’s list includes a National Institutes of Health study that says wives should calm down; a taxpayer-subsidized reality show for the Army; and the United States Postal Service paying a “futurist” named Faith Popcorn to give stamp advice.
Click Here to the see the video » Read More
April 9, 2014
Find out what 'angry wives' have to do with taxpayer waste!
As taxpayers approach the dreaded April 15th deadline to file their taxes, the Taxpayers Protection Alliance presents a new web video titled Top 10 Taxpayer Flops, Follies and Fiascos of 2014. This year’s list includes a National Institutes of Health study that says wives should calm down; a taxpayer-subsidized reality show for the Army; and the United States Postal Service paying a “futurist” named Faith Popcorn to give stamp advice.
Click Here to the see the video » Read More
Taxpayers Protection Alliance & RI Center for Freedom & Prosperity Release Spotlight on Spending ReportMichi Iljazi on
April 2, 2014
Rhode Island State House (courtesy Wikimedia Commons)
Today, Taxpayers Protection Alliance President David Williams is in Rhode Island to highlight some of the costly ways that the state government has wasted taxpayer money over the last year. In a joint project with the Rhode Island Center for Freedom and Prosperity, TPA has produced the Spotlight on Spending Report showing some of the more dubious examples of government spending in Rhode Island. There will be a press conference at 3pm at the state house, click 'read more' below to see the press release sent out earlier regarding this event. » Read More
March 26, 2014
» Read More
There are times when federal agencies do the job they were supposed to do, unfortunately there are also many times when federal agencies do harm and cause pain to taxpayers. However, one thing is for certain: regardless of the manner in which federal agencies enact policy, there must always be oversight to ensure that taxpayer money isn’t going to waste on things that have nothing to do with the actual responsibilities of the agency and its employees. Recent examples at the General Services Administration (GSA) and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) using taxpayer money for lavish conferences and pointless promotional projects were alarming, and rightfully maligned by citizens and politicians alike. Now newly uncovered evidence shows more taxpayer waste from yet another federal agency, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). A recent report from the EPA’s Inspector General details reckless spending by employees who spent money on frivolous items such as gift cards, gym memberships, and hotel space for events. Here are some highlights from the IG report.
March 25, 2014
» Read More
When it comes to issues dealing with international conflictand foreign engagement, the Taxpayers Protection Alliance (TPA) rarely stakes out political or policy ground regarding debates that give way during these situations. However, one debate that is surfacing as a result of what is happening in Ukraine is the importance of missile defense in today’s global landscape. TPA is no stranger to this issue and there should be genuine concern from taxpayers that some may be using a crisis halfway around the world to try to drum up supportfor a defense program, the Medium Extended Air Defense System (MEADS), that is so undesirable the bad reviews are not just domestic, but international. MEADS is an international missile-to-missile intercept program with the U.S. as the lead country funding the program. MEADS, which started in 2005, is a program so wasteful and so bad, that even the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) prohibited the funding of the program in 2011, 2012, and in 2013. The problems with MEADS and why it is aptly named the ‘Missile to Nowhere,’ are because of theprohibitive cost, scheduling problems, and bad performance. The fact that anyone is even discussing a possible resurrection of MEADS at a time when we need budget constraint at the Pentagon is alarming. There is another reason that MEADS should be nowhere in the conversation of how we go about reassuring our allies in Europe, during what is clearly a delicate time for global community. MEADS wasn’t just a failure on the domestic side, it was a folly overseas too as we attempted to sell the program to allies in Europe.
March 19, 2014
» Read More
This article originally appeared on Townhall.com, March 17, 2014
It may sound like a fairy tale, but once upon a time the federal government operated in the black, running surpluses that allowed the Department of Defense (DoD) to make significant investments in experimental or future replacement equipment and weapon systems, without drawbacks, oversight or taxpayer scrutiny. Unfortunately, the clock has struck midnight and the budgetary fairy tale is long over. There is no question that investing in our nation is important. However, we are no longer living in the lap of defense spending luxury and taxpayers aren’t willing to turn a blind eye to wasting billions of dollars on unnecessary programs. And, regardless of the financial situation of the country, it makes no sense to continue to use taxpayer money on outdated and severely flawed programs. According to a recent Government Accountability Office (GAO) defense acquisitions report, the Pentagon is set to spend $1.5 trillion to acquire 85 separate weapons programs in the coming years. The GAO also estimates that those 85 programs will experience a projected $411 billion in cost growth and average delays of 27 months. When it comes to consensus in Washington, there is often little. However, in a time where budget restraint should be the norm, billions of dollars of wasteful defense spending is not something either Republicans or Democrats are able to ignore. Realizing the federal government has been getting away with highway robbery of taxpayers, Representatives Mac Thornberry (R-Tex.) and Adam Smith (D-Wash.) are leading the charge to completely overhaul defense acquisitions. It’s time the Pentagon stop gambling billions of dollars on fantasy defense programs that will have little to no real impact on improving the systems our warfighters need to meet today’s threats, and start taking real reform seriously.
March 4, 2014
TPA Responds to the White House FY 2015 Budget Release:
Today, President Obama unveiled his Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 budget. The FY 2015 budget is a month late (which has become a tradition for this President) and trillions of dollars short of fiscal responsibility. The President continued his preference for spending more with a budget proposal that spends $3.9 trillion, which is an increase from the $3.8 trillion the federal government is planning to spend in FY 2014. The White House budget aims to confiscate more money from taxpayers and small business owners to fund a laundry list of big government programs disguised as “stimulus” and “infrastructure.” These new spending priorities are sure to be filled with waste and inefficiency, much like many of the programs funded by the 2009 stimulus package... Even though this is only the opening salvo in the budget war for this year, it is instructive to see that the President clearly doesn’t recognize the fiscal reality of a $17 trillion debt and an economy that remains stagnant. There is no way for taxpayers and entrepreneurs to succeed unless the White House gets serious on spending restraint and tax reform. This budget does neither and with no meaningful offers to cut spending, overhaul the tax code, or reform entitlements, this budget is simply a way to double down on the failed policies of big government spending that have been a hallmark of the Obama Presidency. There should be a clear path to fiscal responsibility through meaningful spending reductions and tax reform. That is clearly not the approach from this White House based on what we have seen today.
For the full response, click 'read more' below » Read More
TPA Sends Letter to Tennessee State Legislature Regarding New or Expanded Government Broadband InitiativesMichi Iljazi on
March 4, 2014
Chattanooga, TN (courtesy, Wikimedia)
» Read More
If there is one thing that government really enjoys and that is moving in on the private sector. There are always major problems, regardless of the project or the motives behind any such move by the public sector when it comes to encroaching on the private sector. One example is the continued attempts at government broadband expansion and TPA has written before about such initiatives in Louisiana and Tennessee; and how taxpayers aren’t getting the bang for their buck when it comes to these programs. Now, there is talk in Tennessee that some form (or forms) of legislation may be forthcoming and TPA President David Williams decided to send a letter all members of the State legislature regarding any creation or expansion of government broadband projects.
Click 'read more' below to read the full letter
March 3, 2014
(Joe Jansen has a decade and a half of experience working as a staff member on Capitol Hill. He has worked in almost every legislative capacity in both the House and Senate. Joe will be a frequent contributor to TPA’s blog.) The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) owes the treasury more than $24 billion. In 2012, when NFIP’s debt was “only” $17 billion, Congress enacted a set of reforms to make the program more actuarially sound. The implementation of these reforms has begun and homeowners and local communities located in flood zones are beginning to feel their impacts. The Senate has already bowed to the pressure and killed the reforms. Taxpayers should demand better. Prior to 1968, when a flood occurred in the United States, the Federal government provided disaster relief funding to the flooded areas. In an attempt to rein in spending, Congress enacted the National Flood Insurance Program. Under the program, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) produces flood maps. If your home is in a flood zone, you are required to obtain flood insurance in order to get a mortgage. Unfortunately, the premiums paid by homeowners are not necessarily linked to risk. As an inducement to enter the program, some homeowners were given subsidized rates – rates that were “grandfathered” to prevent increases from reflecting actual flood risks. In years without significant flooding, the premiums might cover the actual costs of the claims. But, in years with significant events such as Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy, the program is forced to borrow funds from the treasury to pay claims. The program now owes more than $24 billion – an amount it is unlikely to ever be able to repay.» Read More
TPA Joins Broad Coalition Urging End to Budget Gimmicks at the Pentagon through Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) AccountMichi Iljazi on
February 7, 2014
Whether it’s adhering to spending limits set forth by sequestration, making meaningful reforms within the Department of Defense (DoD) budget, or taking a serious look at many of the programs and weapons systems that simply are not worth the taxpayer dollars funding them; Congress has seriously dropped the ball to reform Defense spending. And, the result has been a disaster for taxpayers. The Abrams Tank, Joint Strike Fighter and MEADS are just a few examples of missed opportunities to save money and make DoD more prepared for future conflicts. TPA was proud to be a part of a coalition effort focusing on the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) account and how it is being used as a way to increase spending that DoD hasn’t requested. Last month TPA documented over $7 billion in earmarks in the Omnibus spending bill that the Pentagon never requested, and now TPA has signed on to a trans-partisan letter along with American Friends, Service Committee, Americans for Prosperity, Campaign for America’s Future, Campaign for Liberty, Center for Foreign and Defense Policy, Center for International Policy, Citizens Against Government Waste, Citizen Outreach, Coalition to Reduce Spending, Come Home America, Council for a Livable World, CREDO, DownsizeDC.org Inc., Foreign Policy in Focus, Freedom Works, Friends Committee on National Legislation, GOProud, Kitchen Table Patriots, Less Government, National Priorities Project, National Security Network, National Taxpayers Union, NETWORK: A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby, Peace Action, Peace Action West, Progressive Democrats of America (PDA), Project On Government Oversight, R Street Institute, Republican Liberty Caucus, Take Back Washington, Taxpayers for Common Sense, USAction, US Labor Against the War (USLAW), Win Without War, and Women’s Action for New Directions to express collective “disappointment at the continued use” of the OCO account to “circumvent the very spending caps that Congress itself put in place.“
To read the full letter, click 'read more' below» Read More
February 4, 2014
» Read More
F-35C Lightning II (courtesy Wikimedia)
The last few months have been filled with compromise in Washington, which may seem like a good thing. But, for taxpayers, those compromises have translated into more spending and continued waste of taxpayer money. The need for reform couldn’t be clearer when looking at the $1 trillion Farm Bill, which does little to end subsidies and keeps in place an agricultural policy based largely on picking winners and losers instead of allowing the free market to work. Another painful example was the Omnibus spending bill that was passed last month where the Taxpayers Protection Alliance (TPA) uncovered more than $7 billion in earmarks. The Pentagon is filled with countless examples of some of the worst kind of waste that taxpayers have footed the bill for going back decades. The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter gives new meaning to the word waste, yet there are still those defending (no pun intended) a project with problems that never cease to exist. The F-35 was created in 2006 and throughout the last eight years the program has been rife with delays and cost overruns that have maligned the integrity of the F-35 to the point where it has become known more for the problems associated with it, as opposed to what it is was originally designed to embody. A recently released report from the Office of the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation listed a variety of issues that detail just how wasteful and deficient this program has become less than ten years since it first took off.